full-disclosure - Re: Offensive Security Backtrack Training

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <67ea64530803131255w2559a835rc9f948f37bb370cd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:55:01 +0000
From: "worried security" <worriedsecurity@...glemail.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Offensive Security Backtrack Training

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Kern <timetrap@...il.com> wrote:
> I think "security underground" implies unemployed.

does that imply i'm wrong or less advantaged to make an opinion about
offensive-security?

unemployed and in the security underground somehow makes me at a less
advantage than whitehats?

oh, ok.

i think it means i've got lots of spare time on my hands to fuck about
with systems and i'm likely to have more zero-day and intelligence
than e-commerce or the government.

all the best with that security thingy.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/