| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <47E14984.4030600@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:12:36 -0600 From: don bailey <don.bailey@...il.com> To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: [full disclosure] agile hacking? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > I have no clue how it will go. However, just because no one has done > it and there are too many IFs, it does not mean that we should not > approach this problem. > Actually attempting to submit the book to a publisher would probably not work because they're publishing to make money. How can you make money off a bunch of people noone knows or gives a shit about? The publisher isn't going to be technically capable of researching every- thing the book claims unless it's old news. So, because you've got a ton of random people contributing that don't necessarily have any valid credentials the publisher isn't going to be confident releasing material they can't substantially verify. Hell, if I were a contributor they'd probably burn the manuscript. If you publish the book "open source" online, you're just another Phrack knock-off. Either way, it's been done. D -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH4Ul9yWX0NBMJYAcRAu2JAKCy43I6L8Q3WummORPcxDAE3Va+yACgqFqx Qwo045QXOWstyUwBOdIAI84= =4+W9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists