full-disclosure - Re: OpenID. The future of authentication on the web?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <10384.1206370257@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:50:57 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: "Petko D. Petkov" <pdp.gnucitizen@...glemail.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: OpenID. The future of authentication on the
	web?

On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:13:38 -0000, "Petko D. Petkov" said:

> Not always. I think complexity is the enemy of security. The simpler
> the system is the less chance to screw up, the more secure it is. It
> is much easier to secure a single port then a class B network, don't
> you think?

Not always - there's a *lot* of /16's out there that the answer is simply
"airgap it and be done".  On the other hand, trying to actually secure the
traffic that wanders by on port 80 is a bitch, given all the XSS bugs and bugs
in crappy PHP applications and so on...

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/