[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F54C360FA8C8D7A28E0F804B@Macintosh.local>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 19:46:07 -0500
From: Paul Schmehl <pauls@...allas.edu>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: OpenID. The future of authentication on the
web?
--On March 23, 2008 8:04:41 PM -0400 Larry Seltzer
<Larry@...ryseltzer.com> wrote:
>>> I understand the attractiveness of not having to remember lots of IDs
> and passwords, but when you give up control of your data, you give up
> control of your future.
>
> Normal people aren't going to remember enough passwords, let alone
> strong passwords, to make that control meaningful. I do get your point,
> but I bet that the best alternative is to give them one set of
> credentials and make it as strong as possible.
>
I agree with your premise, Larry. It's the solution I object to. The
correct solution, imo, is one that allows the user to retain control of
their data. The password managers in browsers are an early attempt at
this. Mac's File Vault is another. The correct solution, IMO, would be
an encrypted password vault, stored on a USB drive and only available
through the use of a password and some other form of identification
(biometric, etc.)
In other words, a combination of something you have and something you
know, not something someone else has and something you know. If I'm
carrying my passwords in encrypted form in a device I possess, I have
complete control of who gets granted access to my data, and the compromise
of any one vendor site that I visit will, at the worst, compromise the
data I granted them access to.
Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists