full-disclosure - Re: Free Tibet..

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fcdfb4eb0803250557p4add997ana1967f4f828eb5ed@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:57:23 -0400
From: Kern <timetrap@...il.com>
To: "Tremaine Lea" <tremaine@...il.com>, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Free Tibet..

>Jerome, I find it odd that you would tell someone to ignore a media
>source and then not provide an alternative.

I think the "alternative" sources of "media" are in Chinese.


On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Tremaine Lea <tremaine@...il.com> wrote:
> Jerome, I find it odd that you would tell someone to ignore a media
>  source and then not provide an alternative.
>
>  While there are plenty of reasons, and good reasons, to be suspicious of
>  western media, the facts speak for themselves.
>
>  - There was violence in Tibet and a lot of protesters died.
>
>  -  The Chinese government said they did send in security forces but they
>  didn't kill anyone and their forces weren't even armed.
>
>  -  Independent sources in Tibet, which are remarkably hard to find right
>  now, managed to get information out.
>
>  -  The Chinese government fesses up days letter and says yes they killed
>  people, and yes their security forces were armed.
>
>  Just what is it you were trying to refute with this post to the list?
>
>  --
>  Tremaine Lea
>  Network Security Consultant
>  Intrepid ACL
>  "Paranoia for hire"
>
>
>
>  On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 13:31 +0800, Jerome Jar wrote:
>  > Please, I humbly think that you know possibly nothing about Tibet, the
>  > province of China.
>  >
>  > A lot of Chinese people, who used to take western medias as the
>  > representation of good will and perhaps democracy, do feel sick of the
>  > misleading news article pieces produced by such medias on this very
>  > topic of Tibet. If all of your knowledge about the Tibet event comes
>  > from such sources, just ignore them.
>  >
>  > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Gerald Maggro <gmaggro@...ers.com> wrote:
>  > > ..with purchase of one country of equal or greater value?
>  > >
>  > >  Seriously though, those cocksuckers in the Chinese gov't are at it
>  > >  again... wait, they never stopped. Murderous freedom hating ways. Just
>  > >  not right.
>  > >
>  > >  How about a bigger target than Scientology this time?
>  > >
>  > >  China's got the Olympics coming up, that makes them more sensitive than
>  > >  usual.
>  > >
>  > >  The Dalai Lama can be as peaceful as he wants... more action is needed.
>  > >  Alot more. Anyone want to pick a fight with the Chinese?
>
> _______________________________________________
>  Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>  Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>  Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/