| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2d792fb20803270913u587124ecn35394461384249aa@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:13:48 +0200 From: "Razi Shaban" <razishaban@...il.com> To: mastahflank@...il.com Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: Free Iraq Touche. Now a question. Is the USA a member of the UN? Okay. And was Iraq a member of the UN? Okay. So both nations agreed to subject themselves to the UN mandate, which implies recognition. In order for the UN to effectively work, the participation of all nations is a must. When you have rogue nations such as Libya, North Korea, and the USA, thats when the UN begins to appear defunct. -- Razi On 3/27/08, josh <mastahflank@...il.com> wrote: > The second post? Their weapon inspectors? > > Sent from my BlackBerry(R) smartphone with SprintSpeed > > -----Original Message----- > > From: "Razi Shaban" <razishaban@...il.com> > > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:44:26 > To:"I. D." <soufre@...il.com> > Cc:full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Free Iraq > > > > Who mentioned the UN? > > -- > Razi > > On 3/27/08, I. D. <soufre@...il.com> wrote: > > Not everyone views the defunct UN as a legitimate authority on what is right > > or wrong. Occupation is occupation. I'm no friend of Islam, but I can call a > > spade a spade. > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Handrix <handrix@...il.com> wrote: > > > Great post, but I'm afraid to tell you that the truth is out of you're > > answear... > > > you're answer is a classical one that we found in the most of fashion's > > magazine . > > > The truth is in the bloody Iraq across americans army, and others. > > > We hope that Iraq will be free very soon 'cause their children need to be > > kept far from ware. > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Throwaway1@...umbus.rr.com > > <Throwaway1@...umbus.rr.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > =========================================================================== > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:55 PM, net-dummy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Iraq is an invaded country, and America has no right to be there at > > all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, dummy... > > > > The Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in August of 1990 led to a United Nations > > > > authorization to remove Saddam's forces from Kuwait. This military > > action > > > > was carried mainly by the Americans for entirely practical reasons. The > > > > United Nations halted hostilities and declared that a ceasefire would be > > in > > > > effect as long as Saddam cooperated fully with United Nations Inspectors > > > > who were looking for an extensive list of banned weapons, which included > > > > but was by no means limited to; chemical, biological and > > > > nuclear/radiological weapons. > > > > After over a decade of continual failure to cooperate, the American > > > > political leadership decided that they could no longer take the same > > > > patient approach that they had taken for the previous 12 years; and > > resumed > > > > hostilities. After invading Iraq and removing Saddam, American forces > > > > searched for the aforementioned list of banned weapons, and while they > > > > found most of them they did not find stockpiles of weaponized > > biologicals, > > > > final stage chemicals or nuclear/radiologicals. Whether you believe this > > is > > > > because Saddam didn't possess them at the time of the invasion or that > > he > > > > simply did a better job of hiding them than the American's did of > > looking > > > > for them doesn't change the facts. Nor does your opinion of the current > > > > American administration or your opinion of their actions. > > > > > > > > However, the most disturbing part of your post was not that you > > > > demonstrated your ignorance once again... That is basically; your job > > here. > > > > > > > > No, the disturbing part of your asinine post was that you made Saddam's > > > > murderous Ba'athist thugs the moral equivalent of the Free Tibetan > > People. > > > > > > > > THAT needed to be answered, or I would have ignore this post as I > > > > ordinarily do to ALL of your posts. > > > > > > > > > > ============================================================================ > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > mail2web.com – What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you? > > > > http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint > > > > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > > > > Charter: > > http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > > > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > MEZGANI Ali > > > Network Engineering/Security > > > http://securynix.co.cc/ > > >_______________________________________________ > > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > > > Charter: > > http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > > Charter: > > http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists