full-disclosure - Re: Free Iraq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2df3b0cb0803271156t73fae98fq27624d6f9e37b5cd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:56:30 -0300
From: M.B.Jr. <marcio.barbado@...il.com>
To: Throwaway1@...umbus.rr.com
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Free Iraq

Throwaway1,

there is absolutely no sense in evoking 1990's UN-authorized action
to justify 2003's UN's-Security-Council-unauthorized-and-illegal invasion.
Your childish reasoning  is no more than a poor attempt of sophistic
argumentation.


Yours sincerely,



On 3/26/08, Throwaway1@...umbus.rr.com <Throwaway1@...umbus.rr.com> wrote:
> ===========================================================================
>
>  On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:55 PM, net-dummy wrote:
>
>  >
>  >Iraq is an invaded country, and America has no right to be there at all.
>  >
>
>  Actually, dummy...
>  The Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in August of 1990 led to a United Nations
>  authorization to remove Saddam's forces from Kuwait. This military action
>  was carried mainly by the Americans for entirely practical reasons. The
>  United Nations halted hostilities and declared that a ceasefire would be in
>  effect as long as Saddam cooperated fully with United Nations Inspectors
>  who were looking for an extensive list of banned weapons, which included
>  but was by no means limited to; chemical, biological and
>  nuclear/radiological weapons.
>  After over a decade of continual failure to cooperate, the American
>  political leadership decided that they could no longer take the same
>  patient approach that they had taken for the previous 12 years; and resumed
>  hostilities. After invading Iraq and removing Saddam, American forces
>  searched for the aforementioned list of banned weapons, and while they
>  found most of them they did not find stockpiles of weaponized biologicals,
>  final stage chemicals or nuclear/radiologicals. Whether you believe this is
>  because Saddam didn't possess them at the time of the invasion or that he
>  simply did a better job of hiding them than the American's did of looking
>  for them doesn't change the facts. Nor does your opinion of the current
>  American administration or your opinion of their actions.
>
>  However, the most disturbing part of your post was not that you
>  demonstrated your ignorance once again... That is basically; your job here.
>
>  No, the disturbing part of your asinine post was that you made Saddam's
>  murderous Ba'athist thugs the moral equivalent of the Free Tibetan People.
>
>  THAT needed to be answered, or I would have ignore this post as I
>  ordinarily do to ALL of your posts.
>
>  ============================================================================
>
>  --------------------------------------------------------------------
>  mail2web.com – What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you?
>  http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>  Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>  Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>



-- 
Marcio Barbado, Jr.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/