lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <341FE0EA-FD2E-464B-92C6-1CCBC44FF446@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:04:01 -0400
From: G D Fuego <gdfuego@...il.com>
To: n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com>
Cc: "n3td3v@...glegroups.com" <n3td3v@...glegroups.com>,
	"full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Fwd: n3td3v has a fan



On Apr 9, 2008, at 2:53 PM, n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com> wrote:
>> where do you come into the equation?
>
> It highlights what i've been saying for _years_ about never trusting
> your employees, and you've got to patch your offline machines as fast
> as your online ones.
>

Patching your offline systems is important, but I wouldn't recommed  
doing it just as fast as your offline ones.

If you have a choice between patching all systems within a month of  
patching online systems within a week, definitely patch the online  
ones faster.

Much like triage in a medical emergency, you should assess your  
patching based on risk.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ