lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48147F2C.8070908@pluto.sunn.de>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:27:08 +0200
From: wishi <wishi@...to.sunn.de>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Could n3td3v win a Pwnie award?

G. D. Fuego schrieb:

> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Joey Mengele <joey.mengele@...hmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> wishi,
>>
>> On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:19:46 -0400 wishi <wishi@...to.sunn.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I thought exactly the same. Security is a process. If someone
>>> doesn't
>>> understand, that it's better to know the vulnerabilities to
>>> defend, he
>>> didn't understand it.
>>>
>> I think you have this mixed up. Security a destination, not a
>> process.
>>
>>
> If that was true then the system you secure today would be safe untouched a
> year from now or the year after that.
> 


No... that's a general aspect: of course security is a destination. But 
it's never fully reached. We develop it further every day, by finding 
exploits, patching the systems, fixing the issues create it.
That's the processes of reaching the destination as far as possible.


---__----____-----
wishinet.blogspot.com
just wishi - does Netninpo

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ