[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080509235010.194B215803E@mailserver6.hushmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 19:50:10 -0400
From: "Joey Mengele" <joey.mengele@...hmail.com>
To: joey.mengele@...hmail.com, valdis.kletnieks@...edu
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 39, Issue 20
Valdis,
Furthermore, using scholarly resource WikiPedia, I have been able
to find more flaw in your statement. As it turns out, the jews
actually *are* a small subset:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_population
That is small dude! LOLOL.
Now, we both have accepted that any set is a subset of itself, it
is now proven that jews are a small subset of jews. QED AKA LOLOL.
J
On Fri, 09 May 2008 19:41:18 -0400 Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
>On Fri, 09 May 2008 19:38:24 EDT, Joey Mengele said:
>> Also, I got this for you Valdis, scholarly source WikiPedia to
>> teach you about set theory since you went through all that
>trouble
>> to read 9 RFCs for me:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_theory
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subset
>>
>> "Any set is a subset of itself, but not a proper subset." -
>> WikiPedia
>>
>> You see, jews are a subset of jews. LOLOLOL, check your work!
>
>You need to read more carefully. I didn't say "jews" wasn't a
>subset of itself,
>I said that "jews" wasn't a *SMALL* subset of itself the way
>"islamic
>fascists" is a small (possibly empty) subset of "muslims".
--
Click to find the latest solutions to enhance your small business.
http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/Ioyw6h4eDJdVO4MMMaVuY4qK6Ndkh410rG2uFwEDxwpeZzYx3OdTdu/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists