lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <6158bb410806111126i74668937r95d49f3ee8d10234@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:26:44 -0400 From: Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com> To: n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: To clear the air and conspiracy about n3td3v On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:06 AM, n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> wrote: > > Why did you ruin the build up to Web Application Security Awareness > Day? It was because of what you and Valdis said on the weeks running > upto it that nobody post anything. I mentioned mi6 to try and scare > you and stop you annoying me. because people dont need a day. they need to post vulnerabilities all the time. all it looked like you were doing was piggybacking on everyone else's research. i saw it that way, and everyone else did too. > > Your excuse for harassing me on the weeks running upto it was don't > post anything on May 1 so n3td3v can't make a name for himself, but > the day wasn't about me making a name it was about people disclosing > throw away vulnerabilities like cross-site scripting that people are > usually too shy to post on a normal day, because those bugs seem too > insignificant and too lame to post and don't usually give them enough > hacker points on a normal day. then people need to quit thinking they are lame, and post them more often. a day, sponsored by you, isn't going to do it. > With Web Application Security Awareness > Day it was ment to bring credibility back to web application security > bugs like XSS, but you didn't see it that way, you thought it was > about me making a name for myself, even though I already had a name > for myself already because of the bad press and conspiracy links > between me and Gobbles, whoever the heck he is. no publicity is bad publicity. even when you just _don't get it_. people tell you to go away, you don't listen, you even /say/ you are going to go away, and we applauded it, and you still didn't do it. quit lying. no one cares about you or gobbles. > > So everyone knows who n3td3v is, but the mystery remains, who is > Gobbles??? He is the real hacker you should be tracking, you've wasted > all your time and resources on trashing me for no reason just because > you thought I was some elite hacker called Gobbles? I'm still trying > to work out in my head what all the attention is on me for and why > people thought I was someone called Gobbles and that I was three > people??? who cares. so dr. neal was wrong, who gives a fuck about either one of you? > > If that isn't enough to fuck my head up I don't know what is, a > forensic study on me, just because some idiot (Neal Krawetz) thought I > was Gobbles??? get over it. dr neal was doing you a favor, at least gobbles has published exploits. what have you done? > > I don't know who Gobbles is, I have never spoke to Gobbles, I have > nothing to do with him and don't want to know him. He seems to be some > elite hacker, which someone thought was me, but I have no idea about > him and don't know who he is. good, again, who cares? _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists