lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2619E2C1A9F45164B56CFAFA@utd65257.utdallas.edu> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:42:59 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@...rr.com> To: Lucio Crusca <lucio@...web.org>, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: so this is FD... --On Friday, June 27, 2008 08:46:19 +0000 Lucio Crusca <lucio@...web.org> wrote: > > After bugtraq I looked for a place in the old bugtraq spirit, and eventually > I decided FD was that place, so I started reading it. Now, after a few > months of FD reading, I feel bored again. I've never replied to any of the > trolls and trolls-feeders on this list, but I've always been hardly hoping > it was a transient situation, not the main (and sometimes only) topic of > the list. Hell, if you filter out trolls postings and relative replies, the > rest is more or less what debian-security has to offer. > > Now I have to choose: go on reading this, er... shit? in the hope it will > get better in the future or leave all of you alone, trolls and others, and > seek for another place. Look for another place. FD isn't going to get better. I was the second person to subscribe to the list, and I can assure you that it has degraded at a steady pace over time. It's not worth your time to hang around. > I know, no one here cares about me or what I'm > going to do. I'm just posting this to tell you that there are many people > out there that could be interested in reading this list, maybe not posting > for lack of skills, but with such a noise you are making them go away, and > they usually go away without telling you, like I'm doing. > That's the price you pay for having an unmoderated list, which is the entire reason that FD exists. > If you want this list to live on, I think (for what's worth) you should find > a solution. Don't know what the solution can actually be. Maybe a wiki in > the wikipedia style, but with specific rules, community driven, would serve > better than a unmoderated list? > If you want a moderated version of FD, there are some out there. But the list itself was, is and always will be unmoderated. After all, that's its raison d'etre. -- Paul Schmehl As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists