full-disclosure - Re: How should Full-Disclosure be funded?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e7d032a60807111310m41e6a40u12dcc4144213506c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:10:14 -0700
From: "Sandy Vagina" <bigsandyvagina@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: How should Full-Disclosure be funded?

n3td3v wrote:
> I'm still calling for Secunia to be dropped as a sponsor of
> Full-Disclosure mailing list and it to be funded by public donations
> instead.

How much have you donated so far?

> If someone like SANS Internet Storm Center took over Full-Disclosure
> mailing list that would make a lot of sense actually.
>
> Full-Disclosure should be non-profit, free from the industry that makes money!

SANS is a for-profit, you twit!

Sandy

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/