lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <035E9B2A9428D5056B9AA971@[192.168.2.101]>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:51:51 -0500
From: Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@...rr.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: DNS spoofing issue. Thoughts on

--On Saturday, July 26, 2008 12:58 AM -0400 Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:

> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:16:18 CDT, Paul Schmehl said:
>
>> Just apply the Microsoft patches and you'll be fine.  The patches make
>> the attack essentially impossible.
>
> Paul, don't make me take you out back and smack you around. :)
>
> First off - SBC probably doesn't run Windows on the server(s) that they
> do the external for RandallMan's site, so the Microsoft patches are going
> to do squat-all for that side of the problem.  And RandallMan most
> certainly *DOES* need to worry about SBC getting patched - that's the
> *biggest* threat now, is mass poisoning of an ISP's DNS servers affecting
> *all* their customers.
>

Well, I *did* think about pointing that SBC isn't patched, but I thought he 
probably knew that already since he's clearly aware of the problem.

> Paul Vixie already pointed out that on an unpatched system, the DNS can
> get poisoned in about 11 seconds. And we *also* know that by iteratively
> trying new bogus names, the attacker can keep trying over and over till
> it works or they get bored. And all the current patches do is make it
> *harder* to hit.
>
> The attack isn't "impossible", it's more like "1% chance *per hour* that
> your IDS doesn't notice and stop the attempts".  Big difference...
>

The information that I have says it's statistically impossible *if* you are 
patched.

Paul Schmehl
As if it wasn't already obvious,
my opinions are my own and not
those of my employer.

Content of type "application/pkcs7-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ