[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28068.1220156295@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 00:18:15 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com>
Cc: handlers@...s.org, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, Jon.Kibler@...t.com
Subject: Re: Gustav, domain name reportage
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 05:12:12 BST, n3td3v said:
> As for domain name retailers being named and shamed on funsec, I would
> be taking legal action at this stage if I was a domain name retailer,
And your legal reasoning would be, what, exactly? Even under the US's rather
wonky legal system, you usually need to show some sort of actual claim of
damage (or potential damage, if you're looking for a temporary restraining
order).
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists