Message-ID: <4b6ee9310809021533i4c4b8d01l822b7520dcecc6e3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 23:33:50 +0100
From: n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: die

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Stephen Johnson
<maillists@...lonecoder.com> wrote:
>
>> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] die
>>
>>
>>> Who do you think you are, Gadi Evron or something? Don't tell people what to
>>> do.
>>>
>>
>> Who do you think you are, Gadi Evron or something? Don't tell people what to
>> do.
>
> Firefox has detected that the server is redirecting the request for this
> address in a way that will never complete
>

As long as Marcus Sachs doesn't make cyber security a national
security agenda as the next administration is coming in. n3td3v saw
that as a real threat to other countries national security
specifically the United Kingdom, and as such I am on false flag alert.
I'm convinced Marcus Sachs is hungry for power in Washington to do
with cyber security.

I think thats what was behind his senseless domain name reportage on
the Sans Dairy, he wanted to put cyber security infront of the next
administration as it is coming in. He thought Gustav was gonna be a
major cat 4, cat 5 hurricane and thought this is a perfect way to put
cyber security infront of the next next administration as they are
coming in. Unfortunately for him his postings of domain names just
turned into an alert board for the cyber criminals and helped them in
knowing which domains not to use in cyber attacks. Plus the hurricane
ended up making landfall on the Gulf Coast as a cat 2, cat 1
hurricane, so made his attempts to artificially ramp up cyber security
as a national security agenda a damp squid.

Although there is a flaw in his thinking, why make something a
national security agenda when it isn't one? And thats what worries me.
Why not let it naturally be a national security agenda or not be a
natural national security agenda, why do you need to ramp something up
to be a national security agenda when it isn't one?

Cyber security isn't a national security agenda, but folks like Marcus
Sachs want it to be one, so he can gain control of "cyber" in
Washington.

This is what i'm afraid of and Marcus Sachs and whoever he is related
to need to be watched closely, I seen that Youtube video as a real
threat and i'm keeping a close eye on him and any future dialog he
outputs into the security community and wider world.

Gadi Evron is small fry in comparison to Marcus Sachs, although Gadi
is power hungry and could become a national security threat, he isn't
right now, the real concern is that of Marcus Sachs and the Cnet News
Youtube clip that mentions he or people he has obviously been having
discussions with behind the scenes are wanting to artificially ramp up
cyber security in timing with Obama or McCain getting into the White
House, either so Marcus Sachs or his associates can A) Grab front
focus power for the next four years, B) Get funding for various
"projects" they deem as important.

When you've got big leaders talking about influencing the next
administration as they are coming in to a bunch of folks at Black Hat
2008, it really sends alarm bells ringing, I just hope the guy is
being wiretapped.

Sure, Gadi Evron is power hungry, but there are bigger fish to fry...
Marcus Sachs.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSUPTZVlkyU

We need to get the full video of the Youtube video link i've post
above put online, does Cnet News have the full video of the
presentation?  If so post it onto Youtube.

Also, if Blackhat.com have the full video of the presentation, please
post it online.

Can everyone keep an eye on
https://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-usa-08/bh-usa-08-archive.html#Sachs
and email me when and if the video full appears there, we need to
track this guy and keep an eye on him.

If I ever get into MI5, i'll be focusing all my efforts on Sachs, so I
hope the people who do work in MI5 keep an eye on Sachs in the run up
to the election and beyond.

Gadi is only causing collateral damage right now, by him pumping out
about Estonia and Georgia being blamed on Russia and the news
journalists believing that, when really both of those incidents were
the work of the U.S government.

The other governments can put up with Gadi's bot net claims and what
appears in the media because of him, because its not really his fault
unless the CIA have leaned on Mossad, to lean on Gadi Evron, to post
on the internet who is to blame for Estonia, Georgia and whatever else
Sachs and company may have planned to artificially ramp up cyber
security as a national security agenda as the next president is coming
in, (See Youtube video for Marcus Sachs quotes).

All the best,

n3td3v

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists