Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 21:40:12 -0400
From: Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com>
To: n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: die

waaaaaaaaa.  marc's penis is bigger than mine.  i cant figure out
youtube to upload my own video of a speech... waaaaaaaa...  oh yeah,
thats cause i am not invited to give speeches like marc....
waaaaaaaa...  --n3td3v

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 6:33 PM, n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Stephen Johnson
> <maillists@...lonecoder.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] die
>>>
>>>
>>>> Who do you think you are, Gadi Evron or something? Don't tell people what to
>>>> do.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Who do you think you are, Gadi Evron or something? Don't tell people what to
>>> do.
>>
>> Firefox has detected that the server is redirecting the request for this
>> address in a way that will never complete
>>
>
> As long as Marcus Sachs doesn't make cyber security a national
> security agenda as the next administration is coming in. n3td3v saw
> that as a real threat to other countries national security
> specifically the United Kingdom, and as such I am on false flag alert.
> I'm convinced Marcus Sachs is hungry for power in Washington to do
> with cyber security.
>
> I think thats what was behind his senseless domain name reportage on
> the Sans Dairy, he wanted to put cyber security infront of the next
> administration as it is coming in. He thought Gustav was gonna be a
> major cat 4, cat 5 hurricane and thought this is a perfect way to put
> cyber security infront of the next next administration as they are
> coming in. Unfortunately for him his postings of domain names just
> turned into an alert board for the cyber criminals and helped them in
> knowing which domains not to use in cyber attacks. Plus the hurricane
> ended up making landfall on the Gulf Coast as a cat 2, cat 1
> hurricane, so made his attempts to artificially ramp up cyber security
> as a national security agenda a damp squid.
>
> Although there is a flaw in his thinking, why make something a
> national security agenda when it isn't one? And thats what worries me.
> Why not let it naturally be a national security agenda or not be a
> natural national security agenda, why do you need to ramp something up
> to be a national security agenda when it isn't one?
>
> Cyber security isn't a national security agenda, but folks like Marcus
> Sachs want it to be one, so he can gain control of "cyber" in
> Washington.
>
> This is what i'm afraid of and Marcus Sachs and whoever he is related
> to need to be watched closely, I seen that Youtube video as a real
> threat and i'm keeping a close eye on him and any future dialog he
> outputs into the security community and wider world.
>
> Gadi Evron is small fry in comparison to Marcus Sachs, although Gadi
> is power hungry and could become a national security threat, he isn't
> right now, the real concern is that of Marcus Sachs and the Cnet News
> Youtube clip that mentions he or people he has obviously been having
> discussions with behind the scenes are wanting to artificially ramp up
> cyber security in timing with Obama or McCain getting into the White
> House, either so Marcus Sachs or his associates can A) Grab front
> focus power for the next four years, B) Get funding for various
> "projects" they deem as important.
>
> When you've got big leaders talking about influencing the next
> administration as they are coming in to a bunch of folks at Black Hat
> 2008, it really sends alarm bells ringing, I just hope the guy is
> being wiretapped.
>
> Sure, Gadi Evron is power hungry, but there are bigger fish to fry...
> Marcus Sachs.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSUPTZVlkyU
>
> We need to get the full video of the Youtube video link i've post
> above put online, does Cnet News have the full video of the
> presentation?  If so post it onto Youtube.
>
> Also, if Blackhat.com have the full video of the presentation, please
> post it online.
>
> Can everyone keep an eye on
> https://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-usa-08/bh-usa-08-archive.html#Sachs
> and email me when and if the video full appears there, we need to
> track this guy and keep an eye on him.
>
> If I ever get into MI5, i'll be focusing all my efforts on Sachs, so I
> hope the people who do work in MI5 keep an eye on Sachs in the run up
> to the election and beyond.
>
> Gadi is only causing collateral damage right now, by him pumping out
> about Estonia and Georgia being blamed on Russia and the news
> journalists believing that, when really both of those incidents were
> the work of the U.S government.
>
> The other governments can put up with Gadi's bot net claims and what
> appears in the media because of him, because its not really his fault
> unless the CIA have leaned on Mossad, to lean on Gadi Evron, to post
> on the internet who is to blame for Estonia, Georgia and whatever else
> Sachs and company may have planned to artificially ramp up cyber
> security as a national security agenda as the next president is coming
> in, (See Youtube video for Marcus Sachs quotes).
>
> All the best,
>
> n3td3v
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists