full-disclosure - Re: [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <131350.1221513299@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:14:59 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC] Very Low Signal to Noise Ratio on FD

On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 21:56:47 BST, n3td3v said:

> If you filter FD, the terrorists might be missed out by accident!!! Is
> that a risk you can take post-9/11???

If you're doing *actual* threat analysis, the risk that a *credible* threat
will be pre-announced on the F-D list (as opposed to wannabes that couldn't
terrorize their way out of a wet box of tissues) is sufficiently low that it
can probably be ignored.

If you're doing Security Theatre, or Firesign Theatre, or other surreal
theatrical event, the rules are of course different...

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/