lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:49:10 -0400 From: "Exibar" <exibar@...lair.com> To: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>, <info@...egary.org.uk> Subject: Re: [inbox] Re: Supporters urge halt to hacker'sextraditionto US He faces a MAXIMUM sentence of 60 years.... I seriously doubt he'll get the maximum. I hear that in the UK people are calling him innocent, and that he didn't do anything wrong, he doesn't deserve to be tried.... The words are both with the US AND with the UK.... Goes both ways.... Exibar -----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of n3td3v Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2008 8:52 PM To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk; n3td3v; info@...egary.org.uk Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] [inbox] Re: Supporters urge halt to hacker'sextraditionto US If you're only going to give him 4 years, then don't say he's gonna get 60 and that he is gonna fry. This is what is causing all the problems, just say we're gonna give you 4 years if you come over. Don't come out with the usual American crap about going to fry. It really is all about the fry comment and 60 year stuff thats causing all the problems. If America isn't going to give him 60 years, then don't make out that he is with the fry comment, the language is causing a lot of issues. The Americans need to stop screwing with the guys head and be fair about whats going to happen to him, he has admitted to the crime, he has been fair with you, now you be fair with him, and stop all this gonna fry non-sence. On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 1:36 AM, n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Exibar <exibar@...lair.com> wrote: >> >> I lighter sentence should be given, and probably will be given... >> > > Yet the Americans haven't comforted anybody in that respect, they've > said the usually rhetoric you expect to hear from them, "we want to > see him fry" and won't give any guarantees of a lenient sentence, > thats whats causing all the problems and uncertainties. > > If Gary Mckinnon thought he was going to get a fair trial and a fair > sentence, he would have flown over. The problem arises that the U.S > are noising him up and saying he is gonna fry. > > "American officials involved in this case have stated that they want > to see him 'fry'."-- BBC. > > All the best, > > n3td3v > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists