lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:49:10 -0400
From: "Exibar" <exibar@...lair.com>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>,
	<info@...egary.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [inbox] Re: Supporters urge halt to
	hacker'sextraditionto US

 He faces a MAXIMUM sentence of 60 years....  I seriously doubt he'll get
the maximum.

  I hear that in the UK people are calling him innocent, and that he didn't
do anything wrong, he doesn't deserve to be tried....  

  The words are both with the US AND with the UK.... Goes both ways....

 Exibar

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of n3td3v
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2008 8:52 PM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk; n3td3v; info@...egary.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] [inbox] Re: Supporters urge halt to
hacker'sextraditionto US

If you're only going to give him 4 years, then don't say he's gonna
get 60 and that he is gonna fry. This is what is causing all the
problems, just say we're gonna give you 4 years if you come over.

Don't come out with the usual American crap about going to fry. It
really is all about the fry comment and 60 year stuff thats causing
all the problems.

If America isn't going to give him 60 years, then don't make out that
he is with the fry comment, the language is causing a lot of issues.

The Americans need to stop screwing with the guys head and be fair
about whats going to happen to him, he has admitted to the crime, he
has been fair with you, now you be fair with him, and stop all this
gonna fry non-sence.

On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 1:36 AM, n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Exibar <exibar@...lair.com> wrote:
>>
>> I lighter sentence should be given, and probably will be given...
>>
>
> Yet the Americans haven't comforted anybody in that respect, they've
> said the usually rhetoric you expect to hear from them, "we want to
> see him fry" and won't give any guarantees of a lenient sentence,
> thats whats causing all the problems and uncertainties.
>
> If Gary Mckinnon thought he was going to get a fair trial and a fair
> sentence, he would have flown over. The problem arises that the U.S
> are noising him up and saying he is gonna fry.
>
> "American officials involved in this case have stated that they want
> to see him 'fry'."-- BBC.
>
> All the best,
>
> n3td3v
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists