full-disclosure - Re: [inbox] Re: Supporters urge halt to, hacker's, extradition to US

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <39980.1222810425@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:33:45 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: degeneracypressure@...il.com
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [inbox] Re: Supporters urge halt to, hacker's,
	extradition to US

On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:03:07 EDT, Eliah Kagan said:

> Once the three-way handshake is complete, the client is in the
> server's house, and may go into any room (this is application-layer
> now) not forbidden by a security mechanism or law of the land. One
> would be hard pressed to argue that an authentication system without a
> password set is a security mechanism.

Actually, once the three-way handshake is complete, the situation is more
like "the client is talking to the server at the front door or on the
telephone, and has *not* been specifically invited into the interior of
the house".

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/