lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081002155353.GA82330@infiltrated.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:53:53 -0500
From: "J. Oquendo" <sil@...iltrated.net>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Hotel Network Security: A Study of Computer
	Networks in U.S. Hotels

On Thu, 02 Oct 2008, Josh Ogle wrote:

> the technology exists to increase a hotel network?s security, a hotel 
> could potentially be considered at fault for not taking the necessary 
> precautions to protect their guests from hackers.

FYI, just because the technology exists does not mean
hoteliers have to run out and accomodate everyone in
deploying these technologies. If employees were trained
in the risks associated with technology, many of these
technologies would go the way of the dinosaur.

Supposing someone made you aware of the danger of
logging into a network because of the impact of
sniffers. Would you PERSONALLY be cruising random
hotspots. If you knew definitively the person who
runs the network could see and record everything
you did, I'm sure the chances of you picking up
any network to surf on would diminish.

Many people aren't aware of the dangers and this
is the root of the problem. Technology is nothing
more than a stepping stone. Corporations have the
capabilities (or should have) to protect their
assets on a layered approach and instances like
this - employees hooking up from a hotel - can be
mitigated way before the fact. Its called policy.



=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
J. Oquendo
SGFA, SGFE, CNDA, CHFI, OSCP

"A good district attorney can indict a ham sandwich
if he wants to ... The accusations harm as much as
the convictions ... they're obviously harmful or it
wouldn't be news.." - John Carter

wget -qO - www.infiltrated.net/sig|perl

http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3AC173DB

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ