full-disclosure - Re: security industry software license

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:07:25 +0100
From: n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: security industry software license

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:45 PM,  <Glenn.Everhart@...se.com> wrote:
> Recall that government licenses historically serve mainly to limit the size of
> a field and enrich those who get licensed, and exclude a number of competent
> people.
>
> Personally I do not favor such measures...speaking for myself here.
>
> Glenn Everhart
>

i had to get this http://www.disclosurescotland.co.uk/aboutds.htm to
go on an ethical hacking security course, maybe we can use the same
thing for the security industry software license?

side note to mike my new stalker:
yep, don't worry mike, the government checked me out long ago :)

http://www.disclosurescotland.co.uk/index.htm

there is already vetting in place for certain security jobs and
courses, so why not extend it to security software?

afterall, part of the reason for the vetting for the security jobs and
courses is because of the security tools they use?

except the new license i propose, would be for everyone at home as
well, not just folks in known about security jobs or on courses...

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/