full-disclosure - Re: security industry software license

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:47:10 -0300
From: M.B.Jr. <marcio.barbado@...il.com>
To: "Buhrmaster, Gary" <gtb@...c.stanford.edu>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Subject: Re: security industry software license

Any OSI-based set, but without enforcing security-through-obscurity concepts.
Maybe adapting some Bell-LaPadula ideas.
There are lots of models to discuss about. The real question however is:

can we start fresh?

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Buhrmaster, Gary <gtb@...c.stanford.edu> wrote:
>
>> >   * writing a whole new set of protocols to be used over a whole new
>> > independent backbone infrastructure; and
>>
>> I suggest the OSI protocol stack, for the security-through-obscurity
>> benefits.  ASN.1, anybody? :)
>>
>
> GOSIP anyone?
>
> I think the DMS was claimed to be more secure
> since it was based on OSI.
>

-- 
Marcio Barbado, Jr.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/