lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e734df3a0811270032s4a0df978oa157a36af4bf60b3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 14:02:40 +0530
From: "Mike C" <mike.cartall@...il.com>
To: Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Fwd: Comment on: 2 engineers from China
	sentenced for espionage

This is just to inform the list that I'm in the process of discussions with
the quoted individuals offline, and have made progress in increasing the
signal to noise ratio of the full-disclosure mailing list.

(As to the current progress, we're discussing if the rival list n3td3v on
google groups may be the reason for the flamish mails. I'll update the list
as to the progress here)

--
MC

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com> wrote:

> this just in:  mike c says "n3td3v's group is pointless and redundant"
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Mike C <mike.cartall@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:40 AM, n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Mike C
> >
> > i'd just like to clarify that as of yet I'm not a part of your group as a
> > matter of principle. there is a far more focussed and serious mailing
> list
> > where this stuff belongs.
> >
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com> wrote:
> >> > name 1?
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:01 AM, n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Mike C <mike.cartall@...il.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>> For what it's worth, i think the n3td3v groups feed is a bad idea
> >> >>> because not many serious researchers have joined that group
> >> >>
> >> >> there are plenty of serious researchers on the group though they
> >> >> appear to be taking advantage of the feed instead of talking.
> >> >>
> >
> > I'm sure theres no reason to doubt that. The fact remains full-disclosure
> is
> > where it all happens.
> >
> > --
> > MC
> >
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ