full-disclosure - Re: We're letting the bad guys win

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4b6ee9310812090855t1b16d3a1sb2b654a147e902b7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:55:08 +0000
From: n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com>
To: "Paul Schmehl" <pschmehl_lists@...rr.com>,
	full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: We're letting the bad guys win

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@...rr.com> wrote:
> --On Tuesday, December 09, 2008 00:25:18 -0600 Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:03:57 GMT, n3td3v said:
>>> We need to stop this back and forth fighting its making infosec look
>>> bad, this isn't what infosec should be about.
>>
>> It's making one very small insignificant corner of infosec look bad.
>>
>> Let's keep a sense of perspective, guys.
>
> Or, to look at it another way, it's tying up all the idiots in one place and
> keeping the rest of infosec unsullied.  :-)
>

I agree,
But full-disclosure shouldn't be full of idiots so why do we let it be
that way. It's because we reply to them that it happens. I was
gullible and naive to reply to them, i'm not replying to them anymore.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/