| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:42:51 -0500 From: Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com> To: n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: We're letting the bad guys win uve said that before fucknut. On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:55 AM, n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@...rr.com> wrote: >> --On Tuesday, December 09, 2008 00:25:18 -0600 Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote: >> >>> >>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:03:57 GMT, n3td3v said: >>>> We need to stop this back and forth fighting its making infosec look >>>> bad, this isn't what infosec should be about. >>> >>> It's making one very small insignificant corner of infosec look bad. >>> >>> Let's keep a sense of perspective, guys. >> >> Or, to look at it another way, it's tying up all the idiots in one place and >> keeping the rest of infosec unsullied. :-) >> > > I agree, > But full-disclosure shouldn't be full of idiots so why do we let it be > that way. It's because we reply to them that it happens. I was > gullible and naive to reply to them, i'm not replying to them anymore. > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists