full-disclosure - Re: FD subject line/name of org suggestion...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BAY101-W26851BB5F222C7E031109FDBF80@phx.gbl>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:28:05 +0000
From: "- o z  - ." <osgo@...mail.com>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: FD subject line/name of org suggestion...

From: nytrokiss@...il.com
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] FD subject line/name of org suggestion...

This is quite simple to do on Gmail. All you need to do is open any full-disclosure email. Then click on show details and select filter messages from this mailing list. 

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 6:10 PM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:

On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:39:51 EST, Phillip Partipilo said:

> Could try a separate folder and using rules to segregate FD emails.

> There really arent *that* many emails, I mean, compared to nearly

> insane volume of ntsysadmin or activedir.

Nytrokiss, are you really suggesting, as a general rule, to use a *web-browser* on an unmoderated
security forum that occasionally includes live exploit code....that runs in said browser?    Call me old 
fashioned, but man, I don't think that's a good idea.  I don't want to read it with Lynx, either.  I've got 
some damn good SMTP clients, like Pine v.01a, OK?

(Slapping-Self, 'cause the G5 no workie, again...!  Do as I say, not as I do, hah!  Slap!)

Getting back to the org. premise, some of you here don't think the org. ID's are getting a little
out of hand in their length?  I meekly submit the notion that this practice may have something to 
do with Ego/Promo...I dunno, really, what is the requirement for an extra space/length "[ blah-blah1371117 ]" 
between the characters....if only to center the eye on the author?

Indeed, instead of "[Full-disclosure]" wouldn't "[FD]" work just the same for filtering?  And give us 
more space?  Yeah, I think it would.

...and it's a ton of emails, especially if you run a few flavors of 'Nix and do your best not to become a 
bad Netizen.  Or if someone posts, ranting they've been Fed-Poizoned...?  Think how many wage-drones 
you've worked with that have no care of exploits on FD, and suffered the consequences because of it? 

I stand by my suggestions.

-oz

_________________________________________________________________
Explore the seven wonders of the world
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+world&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE
Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/