| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <6158bb410812211728o798f5067w154cdeb3ef658916@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:28:52 -0500 From: Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com> To: n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> Cc: n3td3v <n3td3v@...glegroups.com>, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: Microsoft issues out-of-band patch yes, he even says so on his twitter feed. On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 9:22 AM, n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Nick FitzGerald > <nick@...us-l.demon.co.uk> wrote: >> n3td3v wrote: >> >> <<snip>> >>> What i'm saying is this: MI5's systems are patched against flaws that >>> only they know about and their technicians have developed their own >>> in-house patches for them. >>> >>> If that isn't impressive I don't know what is. >> >> Didn't you rail against the ZERT efforts when 0-days were being widely >> used in the wild and MS was doing "nothing much" abou them? >> >> Oh, sorry, I forgot which publicity whore I was talking to... >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Nick FitzGerald >> > > Yes, i'm against *publicly available* third party patches of any kind > and always have been. > > Best wishes, > > Andrew > > http://twitter.com/n3td3v > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists