full-disclosure - Re: FD / lists.grok.org

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090105192558.GC16795@sentinelchicken.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:25:58 -0800
From: Tim <tim-security@...tinelchicken.org>
To: James Matthews <nytrokiss@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: FD / lists.grok.org - bad SSL cert

> SSL certs cost money. This one works the same. etc..

Uh, no, actually CAs provide some weak assurance that the certificate is
the real one and associated with that server.  A self-signed one
provides none.  If you can't, in some way, authenticate the certificate
then SSL is not any better than sending data plain text.  It's not that
I approve of the current SSL PKI regime, but it's still better than
none.

tim

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/