[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4b6ee9310901080845h6725abe8q5a7092e80b66bfc5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 16:45:34 +0000
From: n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com>
To: ureleet@...il.com, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Full-Disclosure wouldn't let me post this
message
It's some kind of peer pressure tactic he's been trying, its pretty
lame though and just ruins the list by arguing with me. I'm not like
Gobbles who released a vulnerability out of peer preassure that was
pretty lame :) You're messing with the big boys Ureleet, so maybe
after a whole year trying your tactic, you kill off your nickname now
and try something different on a different name?
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Steve Clement <steve@...alhost.lu> wrote:
> Can please eveyone reply to this thread so I know who hates who (it's for my
> Social profile of this list)
> But more importantly so I know (or rather all know) who to filter out
> because they lack the respect to take their "wars" offline (cmon' nuke each
> other already it's easy and I know people that know people to provide the
> pure stuff)
>
> anyways kids,
>
> Cheers.
>
> Steve Clement
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists