full-disclosure - Re: Why are you against n3td3v?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:14:36 +0000
From: andrew.wallace <andrew.wallace@...ketmail.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Why are you against n3td3v?

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 5:54 PM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:09:58 GMT, you said:
>
>> I'm not a troll and only serious researchers are subscribed to the
>> n3td3v mailing list group.
>
> What does the following read like?  A serious researcher? Or a troll/idiot?

You're doing yourself no good Valdis calling me an idiot you will only
lose your own resolve.

> ---
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?
> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:40:54 +0000
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
>
> Vord from the in-famous script kiddie channel #hackphreak!! omg, thats
> the biggest no credibility lamer channel ever.
>
> Its channels like #hackphreak which give IRC a bad name, the exact
> reason this thread started probably!!
>
> Vord, go back to #hackphreak kiddo.
> ---
>
> Oh, and if you can't remember, it was From: n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com>

There is nothing there that anyone with a clue would disagree with.

>
>> I have and I see me saying things that people thought I was saying to
>> get a reaction when they are actually real things that are going on
>> and my actual opinion on things.
>
> Unfortunately for your reputation, that's quite close to "No, I'm not a troll,
> I really had such stupid opinions on things".
>
> >From there, it's just a short jump to "He's consistently clueless on *this*
> list - if he actually *has* 4500 people on another list, he's either equally
> clueless there and people read it for the humor value, or he's actually
> intelligent there - in which case he's a troll playing an idiot here".

I'm not clueless on this list everything I say is pretty accurate.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/