lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2ae4a3e30901121058r1e71a462ue817b8ce127feb6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:58:25 -0500
From: "nzerozero p" <nzerozerop@...il.com>
To: Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Postings

I thought you said you were going to lay off "Andrew".  If that is his
real name.  I wish this would stop on both sides of the aisle, as it
were.

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com> wrote:
> uh, how is it that that information narrows me down?  my name is
> ureleet.  i go by no other alias, my mother gave me that name.  sorry
> to tell u and shoot down ur conspiracy theory u nutter.  in fact, ive
> talked 2 u, ON irc, USING THIS NICK.  man u r nuts.
>
> u used darkmyst on freenode.  before you were banned (according 2 ur
> little google group, u know, be4 u banned me, when u said "all were
> welcome?").  information which can be found in any of the channels u
> used to be in, which youve posted on here for instance, #pauldotcom,
> which uve mentioned on here.  #security, which uve mentioned on here.
> both of which ive been to in the past, and both of which had bans, all
> placed at the same time against n3td3v, darkmyst, worried, and
> cybersec.
>
> u suddenly forget that everything u do, u post in ur little group.
>
> there r 4000+ ppl reading that group right?  how do u know which ones
> we really r?
>
> THE URELEET GROUP STRIKES AGAIN
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:17 PM, n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> wrote:
>> There has been no darkmyst on full-disclosure, you've just slipped up
>> and closed the gap on who you actually are.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com> wrote:
>>> o, and dont forget darkmyst.
>>>
>>> u liar.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:36 AM, n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>> i wrote an email last week that said i will lay off of andrew.  i did.
>>>>>  and it seems like the list has torn him apart without me.  further
>>>>> echoing the sentiment that i share.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Your nicknames
>>>>
>>>>> andrew is, in fact, a worthless air sucker..
>>>>>
>>>>> now, i know that alot of u have me going directly to /dev/null or
>>>>> spam, but 4 those of u that dont.
>>>>>
>>>>> heres my request:
>>>>>
>>>>> no 1 respond 2 n3td3v.  not now, not ever.  ive done my deed in
>>>>> further pointing out how much i h8 him, and it seems like at least
>>>>> 20-30 others have done so as well.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Your nicknames
>>>>
>>>>> i saw that andrew posted that he was applying 4 mi5.  good luck.  btw
>>>>> -- when mi5 reviews applications, (of dropouts especially), they tend
>>>>> 2 do a little research.  1 of those steps is to google ur name.
>>>>>
>>>>> andrew wallace
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> They know me already
>>>>
>>>>> and they will then realize that andrew wallace, is indeed n3td3v.  and
>>>>> u then will not have a job.  u will fail.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Unlikely if I have intelligence they want
>>>>
>>>>> i also noticed that andrew/n3td3v said that he was leaving the list.
>>>>> again.  ...again...  but we all know, hell be back in a week or so, if
>>>>> not already.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Still here
>>>>
>>>>> i ask that u all ignore him.  no 1 respond 2 him.  i wont, j-f, i hope
>>>>> u dont, biz marquee, i hope u dont.  every1, i implore u 2 please
>>>>> ignore him.  especially those, like j-f said, who feel that they have
>>>>> 2 point out (like me) what a tool he is because if we dont, then that
>>>>> means we accept it.  which is wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Take your own advice
>>>>
>>>>> andrew i leave u w/ this thought:
>>>>>
>>>>> i speak for @ least 30 ppl on this list.  not every1, (as u
>>>>> undoubtably will point out, like u do in every other fucking thread),
>>>>> and especially all ur aliases such as sexybitch169 or whatever ur name
>>>>> is.  we dont like u.  we think u have no value.  we think that the
>>>>> best thing u can do 4 the community is to leave.  we do not value ur
>>>>> opinion.  in case u havent noticed, the security community pretty much
>>>>> doesnt value any1s opinion!  thats it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Your nicknames
>>>>
>>>> Mine have only ever been:
>>>>
>>>> n3td3v
>>>> xploitable
>>>> hackthegov
>>>> worriedsecurity
>>>>
>>>>> u want 2 b legit?  try learning, and not regurgitating.  u post
>>>>> nothing of value.  we read the same stuff u do.  and those of us that
>>>>> havent read it by the time u do, need to step up their game because
>>>>> they r falling woefully behind.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> More garbage
>>>>
>>>>> c u in 10 years if u listen 2 me.  see u in 3-5 days if u dont.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hope not
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ