[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <343fd210901141207r1e0090efn22b692b994586306@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:07:13 -0800
From: "Gomer Stackseg" <faultintolerant@...il.com>
To: "andrew. wallace" <andrew.wallace@...ketmail.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, kgconference@...il.com
Subject: Re: Fwd: Call for Papers: Cyber Warfare
notdev,
Clearly you missed the entire point of my reply. I was hoping that I could
appeal to some level _thought_ that you might see this as a serious
question, and not a springboard for a useless rant. I was mistaken to think
that you would engage in a meaningful dialog that would benefit others who
may have the same questions that I do.
So what you are implying is that Kenneth Geers, et al, are hoaxers.
You, sir, are an idiot.
Cheers and all the best !
G. Stackseg
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:49 AM, andrew. wallace <
andrew.wallace@...ketmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Gomer Stackseg
> <faultintolerant@...il.com> wrote:
> > G'day,
> >
> > Does there exist a "standard definition" of cyber warfare that is used as
> a
> > reference to calculate risk / security requirements?
> >
> > Based on this definition, do we know that the statement you make here is
> > true?
> >
> > Cheers !
> >
> > G. Stackseg
>
> Estonia wasn't a Cyber War
>
> Georgia wasn't a Cyber War
>
> Gaza isn't a Cyber War
>
> *There has been no Cyber War*
>
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists