[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99936.1233673785@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:09:45 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Windows 7 UAC compromised
On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:48:48 EST, Ureleet said:
> y not have ur os secure in the first place and designed with full
> permissions instead of bothering the user. look at linux, look at
> unix. theyve been doing it 4 years.
Well, that *would* be an alternate way to design a system - but how would
you migrate an existing Windows box to a Windows 8 that did that? There is
*such* a mass of software written specifically around all the cruft in the
Windows APIs that the inertia is the single biggest reason people keep running
Windows boxes.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists