[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6158bb410902060946v71838b3fhe5e89f3e717cba86@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:46:19 -0500
From: Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com>
To: Andy McKnight <andy.mcknight@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Subject: Re: Windows 7 UAC compromised
doesnt this work for other oses?
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Andy McKnight <andy.mcknight@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
> 2009/2/6 Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com>
>>
>> ms just needs to tell the developers. look, we are going to do this,
>> heres the coding, heres the new api's conform or get left back.
>>
>> theyll conform.
>
> Yeah, I can see how that conversation will pan out.
>
> MS -> App Developers
> "Yeah, well, we''re pretty much doing away with what you're used to so your
> app isn't going to work the next Windows release. We need to do this to
> improve security, it'll be worth it for everyone in the long run. Meantime,
> you're gonig to need to recode your app."
>
> App Developers -> End User
> "Microsoft broke our app."
>
> End User
> "God damn Microsoft. That new OS is crap, nothing works on it. I won't be
> investing any of my hard earned cash on their new OS."
>
> If an end user's current apps don't work on the new OS, chances are they
> won't upgrade. It's not Microsoft that can drive app developers to recode
> for a new OS, it's got to be the end user.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists