[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f9dcbdc00902061020r1dadf776v6165c305fe7a218b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 18:20:08 +0000
From: Andy McKnight <andy.mcknight@...il.com>
To: Miller Grey <vigilantgregorius@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Subject: Re: Windows 7 UAC compromised
2009/2/6 Miller Grey <vigilantgregorius@...il.com>
> ...knowing all this, how does it get fixed? What is the proper way for MS
> to enforce UAC?
>
They need to put a version of UAC in place that will alert the user when a
process is trying to make a change that weakens the overall security posture
of the box. They need *only* alert the user when this change is with
malicious intent. They need to elimiate all false positives. Good luck
with that.
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists