lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:47:35 +0200
From: James Matthews <nytrokiss@...il.com>
To: Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Exploiting buffer overflows via protected GCC

I would recommend doing the following things.

1. Ask on the Ubuntu GCC list what protection is implemented. (Or just look
at the source)
2. Use GCC to see where the execution is being redirected and so you can
have a better visual of whats going on.
3. Are you sure the stack is executable?



On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:50:11AM -0500, Jason Starks wrote:
> > I came across a problem that I am sure many security researchers have
> seen
> > before:
> >
> > jason@...o:~$ cat bof.c
> > #include <stdio.h>
> > #include <string.h>
> >
> > int main()
> > {
> >
> > char buf[512];
> >
> > memset(buf, 'A', 528);
> >
> > return 0;
> >
> > }
> > jason@...o:~$
> >
> > jason@...o:~$ ./bof
> > *** stack smashing detected ***: ./bof terminated
> > ======= Backtrace: =========
> > /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x48)[0xb7f08548]
> > jason@...o:~$
> >
> > I have googled my brains out for a solution, but all I have gathered is
> that
> > my Ubuntu's gcc is compiled with SSP and everytime I try to overwrite the
> > return address it also overwrites the canary's value, and triggers a stop
> in
> > the program. I've disassembled it and anybody who can help me probably
> > doesn't need me to explain much more, but I would like to know a way to
> get
> > this. There seems to be some people on this list who may know something
> on
> > how to exploit on *nix systems with this protection enabled.
> >
> > I do not want to just disable the protection and exploit it normally, I
> want
>
> Perhaps you should learn first exactly _what_ caught your buffer overflow.
>
> Hint: It was not SSP aka -fstack-protector.
>
> Ciao, Marcus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>



-- 
http://www.goldwatches.com/

http://www.jewelerslounge.com/

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ