[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dd979be40902251643n23a32b2at84556bf4f9aa97ba@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:43:16 -0500
From: Pete Licoln <pete.licoln@...il.com>
To: Jubei Trippataka <vpn.1.fanatic@...il.com>,
full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Apple Safari 4 Beta feeds: URI NULL Pointer
Dereference Denial of, Service Vulnerability
Well you said it: "DoS Vulnerability"
And stills a vulnerability, useless yes, but a vulnerability.
Regards
2009/2/25, Jubei Trippataka <vpn.1.fanatic@...il.com>:
> Why does the industry incessantly call any bug a "DoS Vulnerability". Why
> are these bugs even published to a security mailing list and not privately
> dealt with by the vendor? Just because a bug class can crash an application
> doesn't make it a security issue.
>
> Does this frustrate anyone else?
>
> --
> ciao
>
> JT
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists