| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 14:00:15 -0500 From: Jeremy Brown <0xjbrown41@...il.com> To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: List of Fuzzers Your right, Yahoo! Messenger, Adobe Acrobat, and Firefox only have around 1000 users worldwide (yes, they all were pubically DoS). On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:43 PM, julio sanchez <pete.sanches@...il.com> wrote: >> >> >> What have you ever written? Let us see some of your code to poke fun >> of. If it is as imperfect as you then we'd have a day of fun. > > > If i would release something it will be planified, and inovative, i dont > submit shit for fun or fake fame > >> >> >What's hilarious is that none of them are usefull :) >> >> http://www.milw0rm.com/author/1531 >> http://www.milw0rm.com/author/1835 >> >> 90% of the research above were found by fuzzing, and those are public. >> Clearly my fuzzers are useful. > > Wrong. > The IE overhyped bug wasn't found with any of your fuzzers, and also do you > really > need a fuzzer to find a bug in konqueror ? > > The rest of theses lists are once again useless bugs, because these software > are used by ~1000 users worldwide. > Let me clarify this: i don't say you cant crash some useless > cnet/download/.com software > with your fuzzer, i only say that you cant beat any widly used software with > your fuzzing methods. > If you really knew what mean "Intelligent Fuzzing", we wouldn't have this > discution right now. > > > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists