full-disclosure - Re: BBC cybercrime probe backfires

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49BC095E.9030506@skullsecurity.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:45:34 -0500
From: Ron <ron@...llsecurity.net>
To: Larry Seltzer <larry@...ryseltzer.com>
Cc: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: BBC cybercrime probe backfires

Larry Seltzer wrote:
> If they paid for access to the botnet then there's no real moral
> difference.

I'm not sure if I agree with that, you'd have to convince me.

To me, there's a huge difference between growing/cooking drugs and
buying/using them. I think the same sense applies here.

I agree that supporting the bot-runners is a bad idea, but I don't think
that paying them for their bots puts them on equal footing.

(In my humble opinion, of course)

Ron

-- 
http://www.skullsecurity.org/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/