[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a6b8e350903160132i65bb693asda368bae49f0b616@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:32:39 +0200
From: James Matthews <nytrokiss@...il.com>
To: "Ivan ." <ivanhec@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: The BBC acquired a botnet,
but was it legal? - Update
No it's not acceptable! But they seem to do what ever suits them!
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Ivan . <ivanhec@...il.com> wrote:
> According to Struan Robertson, a technology lawyer with Pinsent
> Masons, in a posting on Out-Law.com, the BBC's statement that the
> activity would only be illegal if those behind it had criminal intent
> is not true. Robertson said "The BBC appears to have broken the
> Computer Misuse Act by causing 22,000 computers to send spam. It does
> not matter that the emails were sent to the BBC's own accounts and
> criminal intent is not necessary to establish an offence of
> unauthorised access to a computer". However, Robertson does not think
> the BBC will be punished for the action "because the BBC's actions
> probably caused no harm."
>
>
> http://www.h-online.com/security/The-BBC-acquired-a-botnet-but-was-it-legal-Update--/news/112834
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
--
http://www.astorandblack.com
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists