lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72daeffd0903251229t19affb67n444e2b64b6ab1600@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:29:11 -0700
From: Chris Evans <scarybeasts@...il.com>
To: Rubén Camarero <rjcamarero@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: nVidia.com [Url Redirection flaw]

2009/3/25 Rubén Camarero <rjcamarero@...il.com>:
> What great references. Owasp isn't the king of vulnerability information, of
> course a website named XSSed is going to count this as super serious, and
> while I respect Insecure.. these days, people have exploited web bugs to
> their max (and I'm waiting for more), but they aren't directly serious.
> DIRECTLY is the key word.

What about indirectly? People love to rant and rave about redirectors,
but none of it is informed. Sure, redirectors often feature in URLs
leading to malware etc. But that's irrelevant without click-through
rates and block rates on the redirected vs. non-redirected versions.
All the evidence I see is that the class of users we're trying to
protect will click on arbitrary links without care for the domain.
(And enter their passwords in any domain, without checking for https,
and etc. etc).

Cheers
Chris

>
> 2009/3/25 yersinia <yersinia.spiros@...il.com>
>>
>> 2009/3/24 Rubén Camarero <rjcamarero@...il.com>
>>>
>>> If ATI and nVidia were web content developers, this may be a valid
>>> argument, but they are not. They are graphics vendors, hardware and
>>> software. Not to mention the fact that this isn't a "serious" issue. RFI is
>>> a serious issue, IMHO.
>>
>> Well, not everyone agreed with your opinion.
>>
>> http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Open_redirect
>>
>>
>> http://www.xssed.com/article/26/Open_redirect_vulnerabilities_definition_and_prevention/
>>
>>
>> http://www.net-security.org/dl/insecure/INSECURE-Mag-17.pdf
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Rubén Camarero
> CCNA, CISSP
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ