lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:10:03 -0400 From: T Biehn <tbiehn@...il.com> To: Rubén Camarero <rjcamarero@...il.com> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: [funsec] phishing attacks against ISPs (also with Google translations) PIKACHU GO! 2009/3/27 T Biehn <tbiehn@...il.com>: > Ruben, > Lets try to stay on topic here, the status of my job full time troll > or otherwise is of little consequence... > > Let me bring you up to speed: Gadi is trying to establish a link of > causality between Google enabling machine translation and an increase > in 'ruinous activity' in that language. Furthermore he aspires to make > this link of causality 'useful' in some way. > Valdis has brought up a rather dubious suggestion that it might be > worthwhile to use linguistic profiling on the text, should it be > reversible (and it's my guess that machine-translations loose too much > information...) in order to, presumably, run some sort of surveillance > scheme. > I mean, Ruben, the humor is there just to spice the post! > I could simply just cut and dry deride their ideas and comments but > that wouldn't be too kind, would it? > > Best wishes, my undying love and admiration, > > -Travis > > 2009/3/26 Rubén Camarero <rjcamarero@...il.com>: >> Do trolls get paid minimum wage or better, like telemarketers? Are they head >> trolls that whip and train the little ones on how useful google and >> unmoderated lists are under your NJ headquarters? Or do all of you fucks >> steal wifi while you give and receive, ironically, jobs that require the >> same orifices that you use during trolling, also under a bridge? >> >> ELABORATATION GO! >> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:25 PM, T Biehn <tbiehn@...il.com> wrote: >>> >>> Absolutely, >>> >>> We can use the infallible word 'periodicity' statistical analysis >>> (which depends on the minutia of word selection, grammar, and sentence >>> structure, which would totally survive the machine translation >>> process) pioneered by pseudo-scientists in this recent millenia! >>> After building a large database of profiles from social networking >>> websites, where they'll hopefully write in the same engineered tone, >>> we can then find their twitter accounts, and then find out what latest >>> evil schemes they have planned. >>> >>> Yes yes all very useful insights here, please keep them coming. >>> >>> -Travis >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:08 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote: >>> > On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:35:30 BST, Gadi Evron said: >>> > >>> >> 3. The imperfect Hebrew looks like a machine translation. >>> > >>> > It would be interesting if somebody were to reverse it and find the >>> > English that resulted in the imperfect Hebrew, and then do some >>> > forensics >>> > on that input text to try to ascertain the original source. >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >>> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >>> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >> >> >> >> -- >> Rubén Camarero >> CCNA, CISSP >> > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists