| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <66056167.20090410132643@Zoller.lu> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:26:43 +0200 From: Thierry Zoller <Thierry@...ler.lu> To: Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: Linux Kernel CIFS Vulnerability >The correct wording is "no advisory was released yet". An exception to the rule? The question is why? If fefe wouldn't have pointed it out there would have been no advisory, like the 100 other silently fixed security bugs that even those that backport don't catch. There is a clear statement from the Kernelhacker groups on this situation, and it is *not* positive, so why make it look like those that complain just do it at the wrong point in time. again see : http://lwn.net/Articles/285438/ http://lwn.net/Articles/286263/ http://lwn.net/Articles/287339/ http://lwn.net/Articles/288473/ and hundrets of others. -- http://blog.zoller.lu Thierry Zoller _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists