[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1241693077.19566.31.camel@anduril.intranet.cartel-securite.net>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 12:44:37 +0200
From: Cedric Blancher <blancher@...tel-securite.fr>
To: Netragard Advisories <advisories@...ragard.com>
Cc: Full Disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [NETRAGARD SECURITY ADVISORY] [AirCell GoGo
Inflight Internet -- No Encryption ][NETRAGARD-2009042]
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009 à 21:02 -0400, Netragard Advisories a écrit :
> The GoGo Inflight Internet service does not encrypt wireless
> connections between GoGo Inflight Internet users ("Users") and the
> GoGo Inflight Internet Wireless Access Points ("WAP").
I totally agree that captive portal based wireless access is a poor
security practice and have been advocating so[1] for quite some time.
But do you plan to release an advisory every single time you find one
somewhere ? The fact that it sits in a plane, hotel, airport, train does
not make a big difference...
And by the way, speaking specifically of planes, this general issue has
already been raised something like 3 years ago[2]...
[1] http://sid.rstack.org/pres/0608_BCS_OpenWireless.pdf
[2] http://www.nmrc.org/pub/present/shmoocon-2006-sn.ppt
--
http://sid.rstack.org/
PGP KeyID: 157E98EE FingerPrint: FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE
>> Hi! I'm your friendly neighbourhood signature virus.
>> Copy me to your signature file and help me spread!
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists