| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <6aab053a0906261201hb177a25n3befabf50c2123a2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:01:37 -0100 From: Fernando Gont <fernando.gont@...il.com> To: Hal Wigoda <hwigoda@...dspring.com> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com Subject: Re: Security Assessment of TCP at the IETF Please check again. They links do work. On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Hal Wigoda<hwigoda@...dspring.com> wrote: > sorry, but the links do not work. > > > On Jun 25, 2009, at 11:28 PM, Fernando Gont wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Hello, folks, >> >> In February this year the UK CPNI published the document "Security >> Assessment of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)" (available at: >> http://www.cpni.gov.uk/Docs/tn-03-09-security-assessment-TCP.pdf) >> >> Earlier this year we published an IETF Internet-Draft version of this >> document (available at: >> http://www.gont.com.ar/drafts/tcp-security/draft-gont-tcp-security-00.txt) >> in the hope of having the IETF further work on the TCP security paper UK >> CPNI had published. >> >> My personal take (possibly biased, since I am the document author) >> is that this document has been the result of a lot of work (including >> the work of the many peple that reviewed the CPNI version of the >> document), and that the IETF should take this chance to work and publish >> something on the subject. >> >> The chairs of the TCPM Working Group of the IETF are currently polling >> the WG for input about this document. It would be great if you could >> voice your opinion about whether the TCPM should take this document on, >> and also whether you would be willing to review this document. (Bellow >> you'll find a copy of the TCPM chairs' poll) >> >> Please send your comments to tcpm@...f.org (and please CC me). >> >> Thanks! >> >> Kind regards, >> Fernando >> >> >> >> >> - -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: [tcpm] poll for adopting draft-gont-tcp-security >> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:25:04 -0500 >> From: Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[Verizon] <wesley.m.eddy@...a.gov> >> To: tcpm Extensions WG <tcpm@...f.org> >> >> TCPMers, there was a thread a while ago about working on >> draft-gont-tcp-security in this working group that didn't >> conclusively give us a feeling one way or other: >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg04489.html >> >> Basically, my understanding is that there are at least a >> handful of people in the WG that think it should be done >> here as a WG item (more likely for Informational rather >> than BCP), and there are also some expressed opinions on >> why it shouldn't. >> >> Given the raw size of the document, if the WG intends to >> take this document on, then we need some people to clearly >> commit to putting cycles into review and contributions to >> the document. Since it is quite large, and to my knowledge, >> there hasn't been a specific technical review of the content >> on this list, but just discussions about if the idea in >> general is a good or bad thing, we still need to know if >> people are willing to invest their time and energy in this. >> >> Please let us know if there is traction for this in the >> near term, and/or we can also discuss it in Stockholm. >> >> - --------------------------- >> Wes Eddy >> Network & Systems Architect >> Verizon FNS / NASA GRC >> Office: (216) 433-6682 >> - --------------------------- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> tcpm mailing list >> tcpm@...f.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) >> >> iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJKRE58AAoJEJbuqe/Qdv/xCPoH/AhdvNcTejJqoOE1J/gDc2Yc >> Iw+GIUgW73sWBuh0ib5oQxv85tvEjQzLOpQtNPdX6ljm96A7ufl3uzB6DBzj3JoF >> O3mqRWf/yFgWxNA7Kmv/FFPf271CUHpnxbnoYBGSeHKb78lS3WnLJukW8F2l+FPl >> 2QZJp0wn6/g2TJFgWoIHtrbHovHboZQtopzfyJWirzVeL+3dGinden3IH6HKDth/ >> t+0kyxlN07sBQDqebNvif6nxf4xU7kPdUap4i00EKhH5WTr49XDD46E1sP9d695i >> MhW1lhZ1jeVkjz/MycuotSKXN/JIiFM6NV5i3vm5vnOkgAjMou7iEULdG/0Xqn8= >> =/HE4 >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists