[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5d6848b00907010631x3b361ce3h64299b8984f3414e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 09:31:38 -0400
From: Kevin Wilcox <kevin@....appstate.edu>
To: "Inbox (Main)" <rokadeana@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, michelle.nash2009@...oo.com,
mitch nash <mtchnash@...oo.com>
Subject: Re: (no subject)
2009/7/1 Inbox (Main) <rokadeana@...il.com>:
>
> Why not just ask michelle?
>
> Hope you don't mind: I forwarded your mail to michelle.nash2009@...oo.com
I'm guessing this could have something to do with it:
http://www.nrtoday.com/article/20090619/LOGS/906199976/1051/NONE&parentprofile=1055
In particular, the section that says,
"Mitchell Dale Nash, 45, of Myrtle Creek, on suspicion of violation of
a restraining order, interfering with making a report, harassment and
unlawful entry into a motor vehicle."
I only mention that because the original email came in from
74.32.173.24...which gives us
user@...t ~ $ nslookup 74.32.173.24
Server: 152.10.248.1
Address: 152.10.248.1#53
Non-authoritative answer:
24.173.32.74.in-addr.arpa name =
74-32-173-24.dr01.myck.or.frontiernet.net.
My favourite part is the "myck.or.frontiernet.net" section. Sounds
like Myrtle Creek, Oregon, to me.
Of course, I could be *completely* wrong...
kmw
--
To take from one, because it is thought that his own industry and that
of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others,
who, or whose fathers have not exercised equal industry and skill, is
to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, ‘the
guarantee to every one of a free exercise of his industry, & the
fruits acquired by it.'
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists