| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2352f85c0907090811o3fe34ceby5256a35eb8726016@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:11:08 +0200 From: Charles Majola <charles.lists@...il.com> To: James Matthews <nytrokiss@...il.com> Cc: full-disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk> Subject: Re: [Rumor] SSH 0-day >>From the LWN article (OpenSSH maintainer Damien Miller), its probably not real, well just have to wait and see On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:55 PM, James Matthews <nytrokiss@...il.com> wrote: > > I am worried that if it is an OpenSSH 0day how much damage should I expect. However SANS doesn't seem to think it's real. > > James > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Kaspar Mendev <kaspar.m@....com> wrote: >> >> See also their update http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=6760 >> >> Though like frank^2 says, we'll see what we'll see. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> From: frank^2 >> >> Sent: 07/09/09 01:09 am >> >> To: Anderson Kaiser >> >> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] [Rumor] SSH 0-day >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Anderson Kaiser wrote: >> > 2009/7/8 Martin Spinassi : >> >> Hi list, >> >> >> >> >> >> I've been reading around (openssh mailing list, some forums, etc.) a >> >> rumor about a 0-day exploit in openssh. Does anybody knows if there is >> >> *really* something like this in the wild? >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> >> >> >> >> Martin >> >> >> > >> > This attack sounds more like a brute-force attack than a 0-day. You >> > can see it in the original post. >> >> There's also the ominous anonymous comment left by a fellow on a blog: >> http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=6742 >> >> The significant stuff: "Expect the SSH exploit to be made public >> before BH/DC. I have proof that I can't share (sorry), that this >> exploit does exist, does not work against current versions of SSH, and >> is actively being used by members of the anti-sec movement." >> >> Signs seem to be pointing to hoax, old exploit or non-exploit, though. >> Unfortunately there's really not quite enough information to make an >> assessment yet, IMHO. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > > > -- > http://www.goldwatches.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists