Message-ID: <32cf00140908011859u1134ecep65a18fd470f3e3a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 04:59:45 +0300
From: Roee Hay <roeehay@...il.com>
To: bugtraq <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Advisory: Adobe Flash Player and AIR AVM2
	intf_count Integer Overflow Remote Code Execution (CVE-2009-1869)

Background
==========
ActionScript code is compiled into ActionScript Byte Code segments, loaded
by AVM2 (ActionScript Virtual Machine 2).
These segments are described by the abcFile structure:

       abcFile
       {
           u16 minor_version
           u16 major_version
           cpool_info constant_pool
           u30 method_count
           method_info method[method_count]
           u30 metadata_count
           metadata_info metadata[metadata_count]
           u30 class_count
           instance_info instance[class_count]
           class_info class[class_count]
           u30 script_count
           script_info script[script_count]
           u30 method_body_count
           method_body_info method_body[method_body_count]
       }

The value of class_count element is the number of entries in the instance
and class arrays.
Each instance entry is a variable length instance_info structure which
specifies the
characteristics of object instances created by a particular class:

       instance_info
       {
           u30 name
           u30 super_name
           u8 flags
           u30 protectedNs
           u30 intrf_count
           u30 interface[intrf_count]
           u30 iinit
           u30 trait_count
           traits_info trait[trait_count]
       }

The value of the intrf_count field is the number of entries in the interface
array.
The interface array contains indices into the multiname array of the
constant pool;
the referenced names specify the interfaces implemented by this class.


Vulnerability
=============
An integer overflow exists in the AVM2 abcFile parser code which handles the
intrf_count value of the instance_info structure.

When intrf_count is larger than 0x10000000, it is nullified due to an
integer overflow.
This results in an out of bounds pointer dereference. The out of bounds
object contains
arbitrary values (in the context of the code which handles the interfaces
count element)
which are manipulated in a way so that an arbitrary memory overwrite with an
attacker
supplied destination and value is possible.

The following is a detailed run trace which explains the vulnerability.
Irrelevant
instructions are omitted. Flash10b.ocx is assumed to be loaded at VA
10000000h.

   let <intrf_count> be 0x10000000

.text:10206B03  mov  edi, [esp+50h+var_2C] ; EDI=<intrf_count>=0x10000000
.text:10206B14  lea  edx, [edi+edi]        ; EDX=<intrf_count*2>=0x20000000,
may not overflow (verified elsewhere)
.text:10206B1B  call  sub_101EAC30
.text:101EAC45  call  sub_101EAB90
.text:101EAB98  call  sub_101D1FF0         ; this method calculates the
nearest power of 2 for <intrf_count*2>  (i.e: stays 0x20000000)
.text:101EABA0  add  eax, eax              ; doubles that value (i.e:
EAX=0x40000000)
.text:101EABCC  lea  ecx, ds:0[eax*4]      ; multiplies it by 4 (i.e:
ECX=0x00000000) =>OVERFLOW<=
.text:101EABDA  call  sub_10224C62
.text:10224C62  jmp   sub_10224363
.text:10224363  mov   edx, [esp+arg_0]     ; arg_0 is the overflown value
(i.e: EDX=00000000)
.text:10224367  lea     eax, [edx+7]
.text:10224376  and     eax, 0FFFFFFF8h    ; EAX=00000000
.text:1022437A  mov     esi, eax           ; ESI=00000000
.text:102243A4  mov     ecx, esi           ; ECX=00000000
.text:102243A9  mov     eax, [eax+ecx*4-4]
; the overflown value is used as an index into pointer table, starting at
EAX.
; since we can cause ECX to become 0x0000000, we may select an out of bounds
; pointer (eax-4). Tests show that it always contains a valid pointer to
some
; object, with arbitrary values. i.e: EAX=&OutOfBoundsObject
.text:102243AD  mov     ecx, eax               ; ECX=&OutOfBoundsObject
.text:102243C8  call    sub_10226D4D
.text:10226D53  mov     ebx, ecx               ; EBX=&OutOfBoundsObject
.text:10226D6C  mov     esi, [ebx+8]           ; ESI=&ArbitraryObjectA
(usually: 0x55555555)
.text:10226D76  test    byte ptr [esi+2Ah], 1  ; <PathConditionA >- must
pass this in order to continue
.text:10226D7A  jz      short loc_10226DA5
.text:10226D7C  mov     eax, [ebx+38h]         ; EAX=&ArbitraryObjectB,
(usually 0x55555557)
.text:10226D7F  cmp     byte ptr [eax+33Ch], 0 ; <PathConditionB> - must
pass this in order to continue
.text:10226D86  mov     ecx, ebx               ; ECX=&OutOfBoundsObject
.text:10226D88  jnz     short loc_10226D9D
.text:10226D8A  push    esi
.text:10226D8B  call    sub_10226CAF
.text:10226CB0  mov     esi, [esp+4+arg_0]     ; ESI=&ArbitraryObjectA,
(usually 0x55555555)
.text:10226CB5  push    esi
.text:10226CB6  mov     edi, ecx               ; EDI=&OutOfBoundsObject
.text:10226CB8  call    sub_102266CA
.text:102266CA  mov     eax, [esp+arg_0]       ; EAX=ESI=&ArbitraryObjectA
(usually 0x55555555)
.text:102266DB  mov     ecx, [eax+1Ch]         ; ECX=arbitrary value  -
usually *(0x55555571)
.text:102266CE  mov     edx, [eax+20h]         ; EDX=arbitrary value  -
usually *(0x55555575)
.text:102266DE  mov     [ecx+20h], edx;        ; JACKPOT - a write of an
arbitrary DWORD to an arbitrary VA


The following is an illustration of the pointer table and the out of bounds
pointer
which may be dereferenced:

   addr      val
   0017487C  00E82000 <- EAX-4 (ECX=0)
   00174880  001681C8 <- EAX   (ECX=1)
   00174884  00174AC8
   00174888  00174BD0
   0017488C  00174CD8
   00174890  00174DE0
   00174894  00174EE8
   00174898  00174FF0
   0017489C  001750F8
   001748A0  00175200
   001748A4  00175308
   001748A8  00175410
   001748AC  00175518
   001748B0  00175620
   001748B4  00175728
   001748B8  00175830
   001748BC  00175938
   001748C0  00175A40
   001748C4  00175B48
   001748C8  00175C50
   001748CC  00175D58

   The following is a memory dump of the out of bounds object:

   00E82000  44 51 55 55 55 45 55 75 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
   00E82010  55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54 55 55 55 55 01 00 00 00
   00E82020  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 50
   00E82030  55 55 55 55 D5 55 55 55 57 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
   00E82040  D5 5A 55 55 54 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 75 B5 56 55
   00E82050  55 55 55 55 15 55 55 D5 55 55 AD 55 77 D5 55 55
   00E82060  55 55 55 55 D5 D5 BA 56 55 55 55 55 55 55 6B 55
   00E82070  B5 56 55 55 57 55 55 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
   00E82080  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
   00E82090  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
   00E820A0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
   00E820B0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
   00E820C0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

   To make things more clear:

   Let 'ArbitraryObjectA' be pointed by (&OutOfBoundsObject+0x8)
   Let 'ArbitraryObjectB' be pointed by (&OutOfBoundsObject+0x38)

   In order to reach the arbitrary overwrite, the are three conditions

   1)  intrf_count >= 0x10000000 // in order to overflow
   2)  PathConditionA: ((char *)ArbitraryObjectA)[0x2e]  == 1  //
 .text:10226D76
   3)  PathConditionB: ((char *)ArbitraryObjectB)[0x33c] == 0  //
 .text:10226D7F

   Given the conditions are passed, a memory DWORD overwrite of arbitrary
target and value occurs:

   *(DWORD *)((*(DWORD *)(ArbitraryObjectA+0x1c))+0x20) = *(DWORD
*)(ArbitraryObjectA+0x20)


Exploitation:
=============
Since the out of bounds object contains arbitrary values, the attacker may
spray the heap
so he/she would have control over ArbitraryObjectA and ArbitraryObjectB
(they would
be located at addresses which contain data controlled by the attacker). This
may allow him/her
to pass all aforementioned conditions and also control the value which is
written
in the arbitrary memory MOV and the target of it. Achieving this may allow
him the execute arbitrary code.

During the research of this vulnerability I’ve managed to create a
functional exploit
(URL of the demo can be found in the references section of this advisory)

It should be denoted that the vulnerable code is wrapped by an SEH handler
which doesn't
crash the application on Access Violation. This means that the exploitation
process may
try different base addresses and offsets in case of a failure.


Attack vector:
==============
Lure the victim to open a malicious SWF file


Impact:
=======
Remote Code Execution


Test Environment:
=================
1. Adobe Flash Player 10.0.22.87
2. Windows XP SP3.


Identifiers:
============
1. CVE-ID: CVE-2009-1869
2. BID: 35907


References:
===========
1. My Blog (contains the original advisory): http://roeehay.blogspot.com/
2. Demo of the exploit: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJb6a-J3i4c
3. Adobe’s advisory:
http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb09-10.html

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists