[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d359a0660908302107q4afdf881qf9820976ad4adac5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:07:15 -0500
From: Lane Christiansen <lanec42@...il.com>
To: John Q Publix <johnqpublicr@...h.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Why FD should unban n3td3v.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
To: Full-Disclosure
At: Sun Aug 30 23:05:55 CDT 2009
I agree completely. n3td3v et. al. annoy me, but I like freedom of speech. ;)
“Censorship reflects a society's lack of confidence in itself. It is a
hallmark of an authoritarian regime.” --Potter Stewart
_
)) ___ _ _ __
((__ ((_( ((\( (('
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkqbTCMACgkQv5kzl5yG7jcikQCdFg7fvyyfB8tW4250CduLiHKp
k24Ani6X2SlLQYfEM8QEN3YgywSpNPNo
=nzRh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 8:56 PM, John Q Publix<johnqpublicr@...h.com> wrote:
> Some of you may call n3td3v annoying, others may call him funny,
> but others may genuinely value his comments on the list.
>
> Leave it up to the reader to decide.
>
> FD exists to be unmoderated and uncensored. This list is a great
> thing, and I'm requesting that it be restored to it's former glory.
>
> While I'm no fan of n3td3v, censoring him sets a dangerous
> precedent. If I wanted to filter out his mails client-side, I still
> could btw.
>
> Just don't censor him on the server.
>
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
> john q public
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists